37:30.........It's not a rugby score but it is the result of the vote at tonight's Cork AAI E.G.M.

It turned out to be a long night of arguments, counter-arguments, good natured banter and a small bit of insult throwing (even though I may have been the only person who heard said insult!) but in the end our esteemed leadership have won the day and in the coming weeks Cork AAI will officially be landowners. Final tallies revealed that the vote was a close one with the yay's  garnering 37 ticks and the nay's garnering 30 ticks. Two voting slips were spoilt (the mind boggles).

A blow by blow account of the proceedings would be beyond my literary skills so I will resort to the engineering approach and present the night in chunky lumps

Lump 1: The major sticking points (procedural and motion specific)

• The county board has no documented constitution or bye-laws or rules etc. but ultimately the attendees chose to skip past that small detail and make up the rules as the meeting went along. For example each club and divisional board was entitled to 4 votes and a simple majority was all that was required to provide victory. Very Handy!
• Some clubs claimed to have  been completely unaware that any such large scale financial moves were afoot - these clubs were beaten back with the argument that they should have attended more meetings. No sympathy administered for the fact that the E.G.M. notice sent to clubs had no details of the motion (so I'm told), and that there were no details of the meeting on the Cork AAI website. There was an email sent out on Monday all right but details were skimpy. The fact that the County Board has no PRO was also wheeled out as a legitimate excuse for the fact that clubs were un-informed.....Brilliant.
• When asked by yours truly who will be named on the title deed, no clear answer was forthcoming. There was some mention of setting up a board of trustees to look after proceedings but I imagine that such a move should already have been before a meeting of the county board. 
• The level of access to the land for clubs was queried but after the question was 'answered' we are still unclear what kind of access clubs will have to the land during the year. I think we are looking at no summer access and plenty of access during the winter when it is dark!
• When asked (very sensibly) if there were any precedents for such a purchase in the country we were told that Thurles Crokes and some club in Co Meath are indeed landowners. No evidence of the success or not of such ventures was available.
• At the beginning of the process the brief was to find a plot of land suitable for cross country but now it seems that the purchase is more of an investment with the proviso that the land will to be available in the event that clubs are unable to come up with suitable locations for county cross country. So basically it will be a field that many of us may never set eyes upon.
• It is claimed that the land is suitable for all manner of XC events but according to one seasoned delegate who has walked the land it will only be suitable for county level events (mainly due access issues, I think).
• Some delegates mentioned that some local authorities are interested in such developments and would actually provide matching funding should Cork AAI wish to develop such facilies in their areas (Ballyhoura, Avondhu, Cork City Council). Exploration of such options does not seem to have been considered when weighing up the options. It's the field and nothing but the field it seems.

Chunk 2: Some definite details/gripes

• The farmer will take 'two cuts of sileage' off the land per year and no animals will be kept there at any stage (hurray say our ankles). As part of the deal the farmer will get the first three years of sileage for free in return for looking after the land (At least this is what I understand to be the case....am open to correction)
• Will require planning permission for any developments such as car parks, dressing rooms, flood lights etc.
• Most delegates would prefer to see a better distribution of the wealth.

Chunky Lump 3: Things that I hope the County Board officers picked up on tonight

• Communication
• Clubs need to be better informed on the business of the county board. This can be achieved by making the minutes of county board meetings available to clubs electronically and by keeping the boards website up to date. Simple.
• Rules and Bye-Laws
• The fact that the County Board is not and actual 'legal entity' is very worrying. Does tonight's business have any legal standing?? I doubt it very much....
• Development of athletes
• Clubs with various suggestions tonight made it very clear that they would like to invest in the development of athletes. At last weeks ordinary meeting of the county board there was a quick mention of hiring a development officer. Tonight there was mention of setting up a junior academy. Leevale would like support for Olympic hopefuls. More of this kind of stuff please.. 

So after all that my own thoughts are as follows

• If I had persuaded a full cohort of CIT and East Cork AC club members to come to the meeting and vote 'no' with me then this would be a very different post. Ooooops.
• After getting a shot across my bow's tonight about setting up this 'unhelpful' blog there will be no stopping me now.
• The ideas pertaining to the development of athletes are ones that I would like to hear more of and if I am honest I think that these are the kind of ideas that the county board should be spending their money on.
• The county board should have explored the shared course development options available to them and I think that we would ultimately get more 'bang for our buck' and more training/competition spaces throughout the county.
• In the end of the day the wealth of the county board will not be lost it will just up a hill near Riverstick growing grass!!!!

Not the most eloquent of posts but I think that I have captured the essence of tonight's proceedings. Let me know if I got anything wrong or if you weren't there tonight let me know what you think.